Let a, b, c be rational numbers. Show that each of the following equations can be satisfied only if a = b = c = 0.
First of all, note that we may assume a, b, c are integers, for we can multiply each equation by the least common multiple of the denominators.
We will proceed by reductio ad absurdum; assume that each equation can be satisfied for non-zero a, b, c, and derive a contradiction. For this we will need the following lemma.
Let n, m be positive integers, with n > 1. Then
is either an integer or is irrational.
Suppose that
= r/s is rational.
Then rn = msn.
By the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, both sides of the equation must have the same prime factorization.
In the prime factorizations of rn and sn, each prime occurs a multiple of n times.
Hence each prime in the prime factorization of m must occur a multiple of n times.
That is, m is an nth power, and
is an integer.
We conclude that
is either rational (in which case it's an integer), or is irrational.
Firstly, we note that if b = c = 0, then a = 0.
If c = 0 and b
0, then
= −a/b, contradicting the above lemma. (13 < 2 < 23
is not an integer, and so must be irrational.)
If c
0, we rewrite the equation as −b
= a + c
. Cubing both sides, we obtain
| −2b3 | = a3 + 3a2c |
| = a3 + 6ac2 + (3a2c + 2c3) |
Hence
= −(2b3 + a3 + 6ac2)/(3a2c + 2c3). (Note that the denominator is necessarily non-zero.)
Again, this contradicts the lemma.
Therefore the only solution is a = b = c = 0.
Note that if a = 0, then b = c = 0, for otherwise
is rational, and so 2 ×
=
is rational, contradicting the above lemma.
If b = 0, then a = c = 0, for otherwise
= −a/c is rational.
If c = 0, then a = b = 0, for otherwise
= −a/b is rational.
Now suppose a, b, c are non-zero, and rewrite the equation as −a = b
+ c
. Making use of the identity (x + y)3 = x3 + y3 + 3xy(x + y), and cubing both sides, we obtain
| −a3 | = 2b3 + 3c3 + 3bc |
| = 2b3 + 3c3 − 3abc |
Now
= (a3 + 2b3 + 3c3)/3abc, contradicting the lemma.
Therefore the only solution is a = b = c = 0.
As above, we can conclude that if one of a, b, c equals zero, then all must equal zero. We now assume a, b, c are all non-zero.
Rewrite the equation as −a = b
+ c
. Making use of the identity (x + y)3 = x3 + y3 + 3xy(x + y), and cubing both sides, we obtain
| −a3 | = 2b3 + 4c3 + 6bc(b |
| = 2b3 + 4c3 − 6abc |
Hence a3 + 2b3 + 4c3 − 6abc = 0.(1)
We now assume that the greatest common divisor of a, b, c is 1. (If not, we can divide a, b, c by their greatest common divisor.)
From (1), a is even. Let a = 2a1.
Then 8a13 + 2b3 + 4c3 − 12a1bc = 0, from which 4a13 + b3 + 2c3 − 6a1bc = 0.
Hence b is even. Let b = 2b1.
Then 4a13 + 8b13 + 2c3 − 12a1b1c = 0, from which 2a13 + 4b13 + c3 − 6a1b1c = 0.
We now conclude that c is even, so that a, b, c are all even. This is a contradiction, as we assumed that the greatest common divisor of a, b, c is 1.
Therefore the only solution is a = b = c = 0.
Show that a2 + b2 = 3c2 has no solution in positive integers.
Hint - Solution
Find a necessary and sufficient condition for one of the roots of x2 + ax + b = 0 to be the square of the other root.
Hint - Answer - Solution
Source: Traditional